Informed consent is theory of liability in medical malpractice cases. This is the final part in a multipart series on informed consent. The purpose of this series is to provide a general understanding of informed consent as a theory of liability in medical malpractice. This review is intended for non-lawyers, although it will be more in-depth than an average review on attorneynessler.com. This series explains the general concepts of informed consent by discussing the Fourth District Appellate Court's decision in Crim, et al. v. Dietrich, (2016 IL App (4th) 150843).
Informed consent is theory of liability in medical malpractice cases. This is the third part in a multipart series on informed consent. The purpose of this series is to provide a general understanding of informed consent as a theory of liability in medical malpractice. This review is intended for non-lawyers, although it will be more in depth than an ordinary review on attorneynessler.com. This series will discuss the general concepts of informed consent by discussing the Fourth District Appellate Court's decision in Crim, et al. v. Dietrich, (2016 IL App (4th) 150843).
This is the first section in a multipart series on informed consent. Informed consent is a theory of liability applicable to some medical malpractice cases. The purpose of this series is to provide a general understanding of informed consent as a theory of liability in medical malpractice cases. While this review is intended for non-lawyers, it will be more in-depth than an ordinary review on attorneynessler.com. This series will discuss the general concepts of informed consent by discussing the Fourth District Appellate Court's decision in Crim, et al. v. Dietrich, (2016 IL App (4th) 150843).
The term “reckless” has a special meaning in Illinois civil law. The law views a reckless act as a more serious offense than a negligent act. Drinking and driving ordinarily constitutes a reckless act, because drinking and driving shows a willful and wanton disregard for the safety of others. While the distinction between a negligent act and a reckless act is sometimes subtle and nuanced, this distinction can be very significant in a legal context. If a person acts recklessly or with willful and wanton disregard for the safety of others, and the reckless act injures another, an Illinois court might permit the injured person to ask a jury to award punitive damages against the intoxicated driver.
Whether a landowner is liable for an injury caused by someone falling on ice or snow depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Like most areas of civil liability, the rules governing liability for falls on snow or ice are designed to be fair and reasonable. The rule makers attempt to balance the rights of the landowner against society’s interest in holding its members responsible for wrongful or negligent acts.
